Skip to content
Platform and migration

Plan, build, and ship inside one permission model.

The Software Collection bundles the delivery, source, pipeline, and service ownership products so an engineering organization runs on one estate rather than several integrated ones. Our work is consolidating delivery, source, and service ownership under one access model.

The Software Collection puts delivery, code, and service ownership in one estate. The value is that access is governed once instead of in each tool separately.

What it is

The Software Collection bundles the delivery, source, pipeline, and service ownership products so an engineering organization runs on one estate rather than several integrated ones.

It is for organizations paying for a separate source host, a separate build system, and a separate catalog, and maintaining the connections between them.

source build review deploy run scope check built inside the permission model, not beside it L1 L2 L3 L4

What it does

One estate rather than several integrated ones

Fewer connections to maintain, and fewer credential stores nobody has reviewed.

Access governed in one place

Repository, pipeline, and work item access resolved through one identity model.

Where it fits

L2, platform and migration. This is the system of work for engineering. Its identity consequence is the interesting part: consolidating tools consolidates access models, which is usually the first time anyone can answer who can deploy.

Where it earns its place

An engineering group on three vendors

The tools work. The three access models and the integrations between them are the cost.

An organization preparing for dev agents

Consistent protections across repositories is the prerequisite, and consolidation is when it is affordable.

Proof

World Class Software Development Finalist, 2024-2025

World Class Software Development Finalist, 2024-2025

Atlassian Partner Awards, 2024-2025

Questions we get

Do we have to move everything at once?
No, and incremental is usually better. Repository by repository, starting with the ones whose access nobody can explain.
What about our existing build system?
It often runs in parallel during transition. The credential inventory that forces is worth the overlap.

Licensing

The Collection frequently retires a source host or build contract, and that comparison is the honest version of the business case. That reconciliation sits with the rest of the estate in licensing and renewals.

Find out what you are actually running.

Fixed scope. The assessment reads the estate as it is: instances, schemes, licensing, and the decisions a migration would force you to make anyway. You get the findings, the ownership gaps, and the order to close them in.