Skip to content
Reporting and budgets

A number is only as good as the model underneath it.

Atlassian Analytics queries a data lake spanning your Atlassian products, so reporting can cross Jira, Confluence, and service management rather than stopping at one product's dashboard. Our work is data modeling, traceable reporting, and the standardization that has to happen first.

Atlassian Analytics queries the data lake across your Atlassian products. We build the data model and the questions worth asking, so a chart can be traced rather than argued with.

What it is

Atlassian Analytics queries a data lake spanning your Atlassian products, so reporting can cross Jira, Confluence, and service management rather than stopping at one product's dashboard.

It is for organizations that have outgrown per-project dashboards and need a figure that survives being questioned in a leadership meeting.

portfolio program program program the number survives the question because the trace exists L1 L2 L3 L4

What it does

It crosses products

One query can span delivery, service, and documentation, which is where the interesting questions live.

It exposes the model, not just the chart

Reports are built on a defined data model, so a figure can be followed back to what produced it.

Where it fits

L3, governance and change. Reporting is a governance instrument: it decides what leadership believes. It also inherits every inconsistency in the layer below, which is why the data model, not the chart, is the deliverable.

Where it earns its place

A service desk leadership team

SLA compliance by team and by agent, and recurring causes, reported rather than assembled.

A portfolio that spans several instances

Cross-product reporting is often the argument that finally justifies consolidation.

Questions we get

Do we need this or is Jira reporting enough?
If your questions stay inside one product, native reporting is usually enough. This earns its place when the question crosses products or crosses instances.
Our data is inconsistent. Is this premature?
Probably. Analytics will faithfully report the inconsistency. The standardization is the prerequisite, not a follow-up.

Licensing

Analytics availability depends on edition, so it is one of the capabilities worth checking against what you already hold before treating it as a new purchase. That reconciliation sits with the rest of the estate in licensing and renewals.

Find out what your controls would survive.

Fixed scope. The assessment looks at permission architecture, change control, and every place audit evidence is still assembled by hand. You get the findings, the ownership gaps, and the order to close them in.