A canvas that ends up holding real decisions.
Miro is a collaborative canvas that in most organizations ends up holding architecture decisions, planning artifacts, and content nobody expected to become a record. Our work is access review and consolidation of boards holding real work.
We work across Miro where it sits alongside an Atlassian estate. Boards accumulate content and access the same way any other tool does, and are reviewed less often than most.
What it is
Miro is a collaborative canvas that in most organizations ends up holding architecture decisions, planning artifacts, and content nobody expected to become a record.
We work across it rather than reselling it. Our involvement is narrow and almost always about access: who can open a board, whether external collaborators are still on it, and whether anything on it should be in the governed estate instead.
What it does
Sharing granted by the creator
Which is why external collaborators outlive the engagement that invited them.
Where it fits
Miro is L2, platform and migration. It is part of the system of work rather than a governance instrument, and it inherits the same problem as every other collaboration tool: sharing is granted by whoever created the board, and reviewed by nobody.
What we do with it
Access and sharing review
Who can open a board, and whether external collaborators still should, which is rarely reviewed once granted.
Consolidating what became a record
Content that has quietly become a decision record belongs in the governed estate.
Provisioning alongside the estate
Directory-driven access so leaving the organization removes board access too.
Where it earns its place
An estate with external collaborators on boards
Invitations from a workshop two years ago are the common finding.
An organization consolidating shadow tooling
Boards holding architecture decisions outside any review.