Skip to content
Talk to an architect
Identity and access

Joiner, mover, leaver, without a ticket in the middle.

Lifecycle Management automates provisioning and deprovisioning across applications, driven by the directory record rather than by a request queue. Our work is directory-driven provisioning so joiners, movers, and leavers change access automatically.

Lifecycle Management provisions and deprovisions access from the directory record. It is what makes leaving the organization actually remove access everywhere.

What it is

Lifecycle Management automates provisioning and deprovisioning across applications, driven by the directory record rather than by a request queue.

It is for organizations where offboarding is currently a checklist somebody works through, which is the arrangement that leaves accounts behind.

identity owner expires one owner recorded, five unaccounted L1 L2 L3 L4

What it does

Access follows the record

A change in the directory changes access, rather than triggering a request.

Deprovisioning is automatic

Which is the half that manual processes reliably miss.

It applies to non-human accounts too

Where they have been brought into the directory, which is the point of doing so.

Where it fits

L1, identity and access. This is the mechanism that keeps the identity population honest over time. Without it an estate accumulates accounts faster than it retires them, and every layer above inherits a population nobody can enumerate.

L4

Agents and Automation

Rovo, Agents in Jira, Forge, MCP with Claude and Copilot, agent lifecycle, usage and cost governance.

Atlassian Anthropic
L3

Governance and Change

Permission architecture, audit and compliance, ITSM and change control, change management, strategic reporting and budgets.

Atlassian Guard Jira Service Management Strategy Collection Jira Align
L2

Platform and Migration

Migration of every kind, tool consolidation, licensing, standardization, the system of work.

Atlassian Miro AWS Azure
L1

Identity and Access

Human and non-human identity, SSO, SCIM, least privilege, access reviews, Guard cleanup, Agent SSO readiness.

Atlassian Guard Okta

load-bearing, bottom to top

What we do with it

SCIM and group provisioning

Directory-driven membership across the estate, so joiners and leavers propagate without a ticket.

Extending it to agents

Non-human identities on the same joiner, mover, leaver path as people.

Cleaning up what accumulated

The accounts already left behind, reconciled and put in front of an owner.

Where it earns its place

An estate where offboarding is a checklist

Every manual step is a step that gets skipped under pressure.

An organization with a licensed count above headcount

The gap is usually leavers, and it is a security and a commercial problem at once.

A carrier onboarding new squads

Group-based provisioning from day one, rather than exceptions from week two.

Questions we get

How long does this take to stand up?
The mechanism is quick. Deciding which attributes drive which groups is the part that takes real working sessions.
Does it cover Atlassian?
Through SCIM into Guard, yes, and that is usually the highest-value connection to make first.

Okta's own page for Lifecycle Management, opens in a new tab

Find out who can reach what.

Fixed scope. The assessment starts at the identity layer: human and non-human access, the accounts nobody owns, and what has to be true before an agent gets one. You get the findings, the ownership gaps, and the order to close them in.

Get an agent readiness assessment

By sending this you agree to our privacy policy.

Not ready? Talk to an architect