Skip to content
Governance and change

A change record that can name what it changed.

Assets models the things an organization depends on, with relationships between them, and is now a platform app rather than a feature confined to service management. Our work is schema design, synchronization from systems of record, and connecting assets to change control.

Assets holds the objects your processes act on: devices, people, vendors, contracts, locations. It is what turns a change record from a form into evidence.

What it is

Assets models the things an organization depends on, with relationships between them, and is now a platform app rather than a feature confined to service management.

It is for organizations whose change process cannot currently answer what a change affected, which is most of them once the question is asked precisely.

request review approve change record who decides, and on what evidence the gate is defined before anything is automated L1 L2 L3 L4

What it does

Objects with relationships

Devices, people, vendors, and locations, modeled with the dependencies between them.

Synchronized rather than typed

Data arrives from the systems that already hold it, instead of being maintained by hand.

Attached to the work

An asset surfaces on the ticket and in the portal, where the decision is being made.

Where it fits

L3, governance and change. This is the layer where accountability is recorded. A change that cannot name the thing it changed produces a record with no evidentiary value, and an agent acting on the estate has nothing to reason about.

Where it earns its place

A carrier replacing scripted asset sync

Custom scripts moving endpoint data are a maintenance liability and a credential nobody reviews.

A manufacturer tracking calibrated equipment

Due dates, intervals, and ownership held where the audit already looks.

An estate where change records name nothing

The fastest way to make change control mean something is to give it objects.

Questions we get

Is this a CMDB?
It can be. It is a general object model, which means it can also hold vendors, contracts, and people. Deciding the scope is the first workstream.
Where does the data come from?
Whatever already holds it. Typing an asset register by hand produces something that is wrong within a quarter.

Licensing

Assets moving to a platform app changes where it is entitled from, which is worth confirming against what you currently hold. That reconciliation sits with the rest of the estate in licensing and renewals.

Find out what your controls would survive.

Fixed scope. The assessment looks at permission architecture, change control, and every place audit evidence is still assembled by hand. You get the findings, the ownership gaps, and the order to close them in.